Poll

Should the number of countries in an alliance be limited in order to promote international growth?

No
26 (74.3%)
Yes 5-10 countries
1 (2.9%)
yes 10-15 countries
0 (0%)
yes 15-20
5 (14.3%)
yes 20<  (wait a minute, isn't this the same as no?)
3 (8.6%)

Total Members Voted: 35

Voting closed: December 22, 2016, 04:17:19 PM

Author Topic: Alliances buster  (Read 1039 times)

Sabah

  • Newbie

  • Offline
  • *

  • 6
    • View Profile
Re: Alliances buster
« Reply #15 on: November 29, 2016, 05:15:08 PM »

alysdexia

  • Newbie

  • Offline
  • *

  • 18
    • View Profile
Re: Alliances buster
« Reply #16 on: December 13, 2016, 12:20:25 AM »
How about this?: a minimum size for any alliance.

VicReyes

  • Full Member

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 215
    • View Profile
Re: Alliances buster
« Reply #17 on: December 15, 2016, 11:21:08 PM »
How about this?: a minimum size for any alliance.

There already is, one member

alysdexia

  • Newbie

  • Offline
  • *

  • 18
    • View Profile
Re: Alliances buster
« Reply #18 on: December 17, 2016, 12:04:36 AM »
How about this?: a minimum size for any alliance.

There already is, one member

Not no members?  Raise the minimum size to 4.

AKMB

  • Full Member

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 135
  • Personal Text
    I'm not Lion to you
    • View Profile
Re: Alliances buster
« Reply #19 on: December 19, 2016, 10:27:31 AM »
How about this?: a minimum size for any alliance.

There already is, one member

Not no members?  Raise the minimum size to 4.
how do you make an alliance then? it becomes retardedly complex.

But then again a retarded suggestion comes from a retard, not exactly unexpected.
Once TFC now UN


alysdexia

  • Newbie

  • Offline
  • *

  • 18
    • View Profile
Re: Alliances buster
« Reply #20 on: December 19, 2016, 10:27:14 PM »
How about this?: a minimum size for any alliance.

There already is, one member

Not no members?  Raise the minimum size to 4.
how do you make an alliance then? it becomes retardedly complex.

The same as how it is now, but the alliance doesn't go into nation profiles or rankings until it reaches 4.  Instead it goes into a dropdown menu of applicant alliances like the free nations in Realpolitik.  It can't use the alliance declarations either.  When nations go inactive until there are fewer than four active nations the alliance should go inactive as applicant again, off the rankings list like nations do; when all nations go inactive the alliance should disband itself.

Quote
But then again a retarded suggestion comes from a retard, not exactly unexpected.

Better retarded than stupid and your fails at life.  All of the complaints about deserted and joke alliances should be treated before your handicap. 

Gendo

  • Newbie

  • Offline
  • *

  • 23
    • View Profile
Re: Alliances buster
« Reply #21 on: January 11, 2017, 05:50:05 PM »
VU had 200 member in it's peak and we were still threatened by other alliances. Get good at the meta game, talk to other alliance leaders, shitpost on discord and the forums. It feels like a lot of people are missing the whole point of bloc and they'd rather just ask for a reset or even try to suggest ideas that might possibly benefit them and fuck over actual coordinated alliances.

VicReyes

  • Full Member

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 215
    • View Profile
Re: Alliances buster
« Reply #22 on: January 15, 2017, 01:45:18 PM »
VU had 200 member in it's peak and we were still threatened by other alliances. Get good at the meta game, talk to other alliance leaders, shitpost on discord and the forums. It feels like a lot of people are missing the whole point of bloc and they'd rather just ask for a reset or even try to suggest ideas that might possibly benefit them and fuck over actual coordinated alliances.